Daily E2E Test Report 2025-07-06 Startup Failure Analysis For Barde And Phialoastro

This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the end-to-end (E2E) tests conducted on 2025-07-06. The primary focus is on the startup failures encountered during the test execution. This document will detail the test statistics, run details, test coverage, and recommended actions to address the identified issues. A thorough understanding of this report will enable the development team to identify and resolve the root causes of these failures, ensuring the stability and reliability of the application. This report was generated to help the barde and phialoastro teams.

🔧 Daily E2E Test Summary

Last Updated: 2025-07-06 03:53:47 UTC

Date: 2025-07-06

Status: Startup failure

The E2E tests are a critical part of the software development lifecycle, as they simulate real user scenarios to validate the application's functionality and performance. A startup failure indicates a significant issue that prevents the application from initializing correctly, thereby impacting all subsequent tests. This report aims to provide a clear overview of the failure, including relevant metrics and details to facilitate effective troubleshooting and resolution.

Test Statistics

The following table summarizes the key metrics from the E2E test run:

As evident from the table, all tests were either failed or skipped due to the startup failure. This highlights the critical nature of the issue, as it prevents any meaningful testing of the application's features. A zero count for passed tests is a clear indicator that immediate attention is required to restore the system to a testable state. The total E2E tests count of 0 further underscores the severity, indicating that the test suite could not even begin execution.

Test Run Details

• Workflow Run: View Run
• Run ID: 16094796587

The Workflow Run link provides direct access to the detailed logs and execution history of the test run on the CI/CD platform. Analyzing these logs is crucial for pinpointing the exact point of failure and identifying any error messages or exceptions that might provide clues to the root cause. The Run ID serves as a unique identifier for the test execution, allowing for easy referencing and tracking of specific test instances. This information is vital for debugging and tracking the resolution process.

The workflow run details often contain valuable information about the environment setup, dependency installations, and any preliminary steps that might have failed. Examining these details can help determine whether the startup failure is due to an environmental issue, a configuration problem, or a code defect. The logs can reveal specific error messages, stack traces, and other diagnostic information that can guide developers toward the source of the problem. Understanding the context of the failure is essential for formulating effective solutions.

Test Coverage

The nightly E2E tests include a comprehensive suite of tests designed to cover various aspects of the application:

• 🌐 Cross-browser testing (Chromium, Firefox, WebKit)
• 📱 Mobile viewport testing
• 🎭 Visual regression testing
• ⚡ Performance testing (Lighthouse)
• 🔒 Security scanning
• ♿ Accessibility testing

The extensive test coverage ensures that the application is thoroughly validated across different platforms, browsers, and devices. Cross-browser testing verifies that the application functions consistently across different web browsers, ensuring a uniform user experience. Mobile viewport testing ensures that the application is responsive and displays correctly on mobile devices. Visual regression testing detects unintended changes in the application's UI, maintaining visual consistency. Performance testing using Lighthouse assesses the application's speed and efficiency. Security scanning identifies potential vulnerabilities. Accessibility testing ensures that the application is usable by individuals with disabilities.

Due to the startup failure, none of these tests could be executed, leaving the application's functionality, performance, and security unvalidated. This lack of validation poses a significant risk, as potential defects and vulnerabilities may go undetected. Addressing the startup failure is therefore paramount to resume the testing process and ensure the quality of the application.

The broad scope of the E2E tests underscores the importance of resolving the startup failure promptly. Each category of testing plays a critical role in ensuring the application's overall quality and reliability. Without these tests, the risk of deploying a faulty or vulnerable application increases significantly. Therefore, a systematic approach to identifying and resolving the startup issue is essential to maintain the integrity of the software development process.

Actions

The following actions are recommended to address the startup failure:

• [ ] Check workflow configuration
• [ ] Verify runner availability
• [ ] Check for infrastructure issues

Checking the workflow configuration involves reviewing the CI/CD pipeline setup to ensure that all necessary steps are correctly defined and executed. This includes verifying the build process, dependency installations, and test execution commands. Verifying runner availability ensures that the test execution environment is properly provisioned and accessible. This includes checking the availability of the test runners and ensuring that they have sufficient resources to execute the tests. Checking for infrastructure issues involves examining the underlying infrastructure for any potential problems, such as network connectivity issues, server outages, or resource constraints. Each of these steps is crucial for isolating the root cause of the startup failure.

A systematic approach to these actions will help narrow down the potential causes of the failure. For instance, if the workflow configuration is incorrect, the test environment might not be set up properly, leading to a startup failure. If the test runners are unavailable, the tests cannot be executed. If there are infrastructure issues, the application might not be able to connect to necessary services or databases. By addressing these areas methodically, the development team can identify and resolve the issue more efficiently.

This automated report provides a consistent and reliable overview of the E2E test results, enabling the development team to monitor the application's quality and stability. The report's content, including test execution status, pass/fail statistics, detailed results links, and action items, facilitates proactive issue identification and resolution. The use of a containerized environment ensures consistency across test runs, minimizing the impact of environmental factors on test results. The comprehensive nature of the testing, encompassing browser compatibility, performance, and security, underscores the commitment to delivering a high-quality application. By leveraging this report, the team can maintain a continuous feedback loop, enabling rapid iteration and improvement.